<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pakistan’s Shared Platform: An Interview with MCB and Fundamo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mmublog.org/blog/pakistan%e2%80%99s-shared-platform-an-interview-with-mcb-and-fundamo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mmublog.org/blog/pakistan%e2%80%99s-shared-platform-an-interview-with-mcb-and-fundamo/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=pakistan%25e2%2580%2599s-shared-platform-an-interview-with-mcb-and-fundamo</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 05:05:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahsan Masood</title>
		<link>http://mmublog.org/blog/pakistan%e2%80%99s-shared-platform-an-interview-with-mcb-and-fundamo/#comment-115</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahsan Masood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2010 20:43:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mmublog.org/?p=771#comment-115</guid>
		<description>Is the MCB model based on WAP or java ? If so, then it&#039;s telco independent and the many to many model doesn&#039;t make sense. The many to many model wud only make sense if it obviates the need for MCB to ink separate deals with the telcos and that wud only be true if the app is based on STK/USSD.

Of course, the fact that access group is hosting the site is just classic cloud computing and has little to do with the many to many model.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is the MCB model based on WAP or java ? If so, then it&#8217;s telco independent and the many to many model doesn&#8217;t make sense. The many to many model wud only make sense if it obviates the need for MCB to ink separate deals with the telcos and that wud only be true if the app is based on STK/USSD.</p>
<p>Of course, the fact that access group is hosting the site is just classic cloud computing and has little to do with the many to many model.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rizwan Hafeez</title>
		<link>http://mmublog.org/blog/pakistan%e2%80%99s-shared-platform-an-interview-with-mcb-and-fundamo/#comment-114</link>
		<dc:creator>Rizwan Hafeez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 10:55:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mmublog.org/?p=771#comment-114</guid>
		<description>Dear Mr Fahad:

Your thoughts on the subject are very similar to mine and yes, examples of 1LINK and MNet are very relevant for the evolving Branchless / Mobile Banking in Pakistan. Thats when the discussion on the Open environment / Interoperability makes good common sense. I have no doubt in my mind that sooner or later, this will happen. But undoubtedly the sooner it happens, the better for everyone. My apprehensions are that it might take us good amount of time to appreciate this and by then, so many entrants would be wasted too much of this time, energies and money, trying to develop something of their own.

Nevertheless, it is very crucial that this evolving Banking segment develops which will stimuate enconomic progess in many ways.

Wish Pakistan success in Branchless / Mobile banking initiatives!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Mr Fahad:</p>
<p>Your thoughts on the subject are very similar to mine and yes, examples of 1LINK and MNet are very relevant for the evolving Branchless / Mobile Banking in Pakistan. Thats when the discussion on the Open environment / Interoperability makes good common sense. I have no doubt in my mind that sooner or later, this will happen. But undoubtedly the sooner it happens, the better for everyone. My apprehensions are that it might take us good amount of time to appreciate this and by then, so many entrants would be wasted too much of this time, energies and money, trying to develop something of their own.</p>
<p>Nevertheless, it is very crucial that this evolving Banking segment develops which will stimuate enconomic progess in many ways.</p>
<p>Wish Pakistan success in Branchless / Mobile banking initiatives!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fahad</title>
		<link>http://mmublog.org/blog/pakistan%e2%80%99s-shared-platform-an-interview-with-mcb-and-fundamo/#comment-113</link>
		<dc:creator>Fahad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 11:11:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mmublog.org/?p=771#comment-113</guid>
		<description>I must appreciate MCB and Fundamo efforts towards the development of mobile banking in Pakistan.

To serve the huge population of the country, there is a strong need to integrate efforts by both MNO&#039;s and Banks and the best form of this integration is through a centralized payment system.

1LINK has done this successfully for ATM transactions. It has not limited itself to ATMs but it provides customers the convenience to use any delivery channel like mobile, Internet, IVR, Call Center and Bank Branches.

If each MNO connect to each bank this project will take decade to execute. 1LINK as the payment hub connects the entire banking system of the country could serve the interoperability between MNO&#039;s and Banks, as MNO&#039;s like Telenor, Ufone and Warid already in the network for Bills Payment and Top-up service.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must appreciate MCB and Fundamo efforts towards the development of mobile banking in Pakistan.</p>
<p>To serve the huge population of the country, there is a strong need to integrate efforts by both MNO&#8217;s and Banks and the best form of this integration is through a centralized payment system.</p>
<p>1LINK has done this successfully for ATM transactions. It has not limited itself to ATMs but it provides customers the convenience to use any delivery channel like mobile, Internet, IVR, Call Center and Bank Branches.</p>
<p>If each MNO connect to each bank this project will take decade to execute. 1LINK as the payment hub connects the entire banking system of the country could serve the interoperability between MNO&#8217;s and Banks, as MNO&#8217;s like Telenor, Ufone and Warid already in the network for Bills Payment and Top-up service.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rizwan Hafeez</title>
		<link>http://mmublog.org/blog/pakistan%e2%80%99s-shared-platform-an-interview-with-mcb-and-fundamo/#comment-112</link>
		<dc:creator>Rizwan Hafeez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Apr 2010 15:10:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mmublog.org/?p=771#comment-112</guid>
		<description>Absolutely Arsalan. While it will take care of the hardware, it will also enable the Brand owners to concentrate more on the &quot;Value&quot; part which is the key area of making it successful in the marketplace.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely Arsalan. While it will take care of the hardware, it will also enable the Brand owners to concentrate more on the &#8220;Value&#8221; part which is the key area of making it successful in the marketplace.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rizwan Hafeez</title>
		<link>http://mmublog.org/blog/pakistan%e2%80%99s-shared-platform-an-interview-with-mcb-and-fundamo/#comment-111</link>
		<dc:creator>Rizwan Hafeez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 16:15:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mmublog.org/?p=771#comment-111</guid>
		<description>Apologies for the delayed response Hannes as I was traveling. I just read what I wished to read. BRAVO!

Welcome to the land of opportunities, where the possibilities are endless.

&quot;Medicine is for the Patient; not for the profits. The Profits follow&quot;. (George Merck - 1920s)

I am so glad to read the developments at Access Holdings and the spirit between MCB and Fundamo. What has been conceived and established can impact our Financial footprint Big Time and change so many lives for the better - God Willing. I hope sanity prevails mostly with the many new potential entrants in the marketplace.

I see a very positive Intent here (Congratulations Gentlemen) and if my reading is correct (which i think it is), I dont think there is anything stopping the Storm Rising!

“Don&#039;t judge each day by the harvest you reap, but by the seeds you plant.” (Robert Louis Stevenson)

I await to read about your next milestone, big or small.

My sincere best wishes

Rizwan Hafeez</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apologies for the delayed response Hannes as I was traveling. I just read what I wished to read. BRAVO!</p>
<p>Welcome to the land of opportunities, where the possibilities are endless.</p>
<p>&#8220;Medicine is for the Patient; not for the profits. The Profits follow&#8221;. (George Merck &#8211; 1920s)</p>
<p>I am so glad to read the developments at Access Holdings and the spirit between MCB and Fundamo. What has been conceived and established can impact our Financial footprint Big Time and change so many lives for the better &#8211; God Willing. I hope sanity prevails mostly with the many new potential entrants in the marketplace.</p>
<p>I see a very positive Intent here (Congratulations Gentlemen) and if my reading is correct (which i think it is), I dont think there is anything stopping the Storm Rising!</p>
<p>“Don&#8217;t judge each day by the harvest you reap, but by the seeds you plant.” (Robert Louis Stevenson)</p>
<p>I await to read about your next milestone, big or small.</p>
<p>My sincere best wishes</p>
<p>Rizwan Hafeez</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arsalan Mir</title>
		<link>http://mmublog.org/blog/pakistan%e2%80%99s-shared-platform-an-interview-with-mcb-and-fundamo/#comment-110</link>
		<dc:creator>Arsalan Mir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 14:24:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mmublog.org/?p=771#comment-110</guid>
		<description>The many-to-many model will indeed be good step forward. It will offer the maximum connectivity and maximum outreach.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The many-to-many model will indeed be good step forward. It will offer the maximum connectivity and maximum outreach.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Pakistan’s Shared branchless banking platform: An Interview with MCB and Fundamo #mbanking -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://mmublog.org/blog/pakistan%e2%80%99s-shared-platform-an-interview-with-mcb-and-fundamo/#comment-109</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Pakistan’s Shared branchless banking platform: An Interview with MCB and Fundamo #mbanking -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 13:53:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mmublog.org/?p=771#comment-109</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by AudienceScapes. AudienceScapes said: #Pakistan’s Shared branchless banking platform: An Interview with MCB and Fundamo #mbanking http://bit.ly/9BacnS [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by AudienceScapes. AudienceScapes said: #Pakistan’s Shared branchless banking platform: An Interview with MCB and Fundamo #mbanking <a href="http://bit.ly/9BacnS" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/9BacnS</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hannes van Rensburg</title>
		<link>http://mmublog.org/blog/pakistan%e2%80%99s-shared-platform-an-interview-with-mcb-and-fundamo/#comment-108</link>
		<dc:creator>Hannes van Rensburg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 10:15:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mmublog.org/?p=771#comment-108</guid>
		<description>This approach is indeed an instantiation of the many to many model referenced to in the SBP’s white paper. This shared platform is operated by an independent entity: Access Holdings. Access also operate an independent acquiring network in Pakistan and thus has the experience to run and support distributed, financial infrastructure. The company is also a Pakistan owned and staffed company – ensuring local expertise and know-how. Access also do not have any retail/brand responsibilities – merely operational responsibilities.

And yes, the relationship between MCB and Fundamo is non-exclusive. Both Parties support and understand the importance of other entities also making use of the shared platform. Other banks and operators have already signed up to utilise the infrastructure and will be announced in due course.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This approach is indeed an instantiation of the many to many model referenced to in the SBP’s white paper. This shared platform is operated by an independent entity: Access Holdings. Access also operate an independent acquiring network in Pakistan and thus has the experience to run and support distributed, financial infrastructure. The company is also a Pakistan owned and staffed company – ensuring local expertise and know-how. Access also do not have any retail/brand responsibilities – merely operational responsibilities.</p>
<p>And yes, the relationship between MCB and Fundamo is non-exclusive. Both Parties support and understand the importance of other entities also making use of the shared platform. Other banks and operators have already signed up to utilise the infrastructure and will be announced in due course.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rizwan Hafeez</title>
		<link>http://mmublog.org/blog/pakistan%e2%80%99s-shared-platform-an-interview-with-mcb-and-fundamo/#comment-107</link>
		<dc:creator>Rizwan Hafeez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 12:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mmublog.org/?p=771#comment-107</guid>
		<description>I am actually thrilled to read this very insightful Interview. Covers the topic and the surrounding opportunity brilliantly. I was also of the view that an open, shared platform is the real game changer and the most comprehensive and sensible thing to approach the Big opportunity. I am impressed with the clarity of thought of Mr Qasif and Mr Hannes. I guess its the same as Many to Many model referred in SBP&#039;s Branchless Banking Policy?

My one question to the two gentlemen is that someone does own this Open / shared platform and in this particular case, who that is? MCB or Fundamo or someone else? Does that owner have any stake in any Brand / service or he only is the provider of this platform to everyone interested?

Second, it can only be permissible in the relationship between MCB and Fundamo if it is on non-exclusive basis? Right? Only in this case, others (MNOs or Banks) can utilize this platform to launch their own specific products / services.

The Gentlemen got the concept right, surely. It now remains to be seen if this model takes off successfully in Pakistan or not? I think the tendency still remains to have everything in house with complete controls but the real essence of this discussion is to let go of unnecessary setup and concentrate more on a high value, well differentiated product for everyone and not worry to much about ones existing, captive clientele.

Bravo Gentlemen for an idea / plan well conceived and well understood. Wish you success in your radical / different plan.

&quot;If you want to be irreplaceable, you have to be different.&quot;

&quot;(foolish) Consistency is the hobgoblin of small minds&quot;

Best of Luck

Rizwan Hafeez</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am actually thrilled to read this very insightful Interview. Covers the topic and the surrounding opportunity brilliantly. I was also of the view that an open, shared platform is the real game changer and the most comprehensive and sensible thing to approach the Big opportunity. I am impressed with the clarity of thought of Mr Qasif and Mr Hannes. I guess its the same as Many to Many model referred in SBP&#8217;s Branchless Banking Policy?</p>
<p>My one question to the two gentlemen is that someone does own this Open / shared platform and in this particular case, who that is? MCB or Fundamo or someone else? Does that owner have any stake in any Brand / service or he only is the provider of this platform to everyone interested?</p>
<p>Second, it can only be permissible in the relationship between MCB and Fundamo if it is on non-exclusive basis? Right? Only in this case, others (MNOs or Banks) can utilize this platform to launch their own specific products / services.</p>
<p>The Gentlemen got the concept right, surely. It now remains to be seen if this model takes off successfully in Pakistan or not? I think the tendency still remains to have everything in house with complete controls but the real essence of this discussion is to let go of unnecessary setup and concentrate more on a high value, well differentiated product for everyone and not worry to much about ones existing, captive clientele.</p>
<p>Bravo Gentlemen for an idea / plan well conceived and well understood. Wish you success in your radical / different plan.</p>
<p>&#8220;If you want to be irreplaceable, you have to be different.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;(foolish) Consistency is the hobgoblin of small minds&#8221;</p>
<p>Best of Luck</p>
<p>Rizwan Hafeez</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

